Clinicopathological Features of Upper Third Gastric Cancer during a 21-Year Period (Single Center Analysis).
10.5230/jgc.2010.10.4.212
- Author:
Je Ho JANG
1
;
Reinaldo Isaacs BERON
;
Hye Seong AHN
;
Seong Ho KONG
;
Hyuk Joon LEE
;
Woo Ho KIM
;
Kuhn Uk LEE
;
Han Kwang YANG
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hkyang@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stomach neoplasms;
Gastric cardia;
Gastric fundus;
Incidence;
Prognoisis
- MeSH:
Gastric Fundus;
Humans;
Incidence;
Linear Models;
Medical Records;
Prognosis;
Retrospective Studies;
Stomach Neoplasms;
Survival Rate
- From:Journal of Gastric Cancer
2010;10(4):212-218
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine proportions of upper third gastric cancer (UTG) among all gastric cancers and analyze clinicopathological features of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 12,300 patients who underwent gastric surgery between 1986 and 2006 at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological features of 1,260 patients with UTG and 9,929 patients with middle or lower third gastric cancer (MLG) were compared, and annual proportions of UTG were evaluated. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with UTG rapidly increased from 2.6% in 1986 to 12.5% in 1992. However, linear regression analysis showed that the rate of increase was reduced (0.21%/year) after 1992 (12.5% to 14.2% from 1992 to 2006). Compared with the MLG group, the UTG group had a lower proportion of (22.3% vs. 39.7%, P<0.001) and a greater proportion of stage III/IV disease (39.4% vs. 31.7%, P<0.001). The UTG group also had larger tumors than the MLG group in stages I/II and III (3.5 cm/5.3 cm/6.5 cm vs. 3.2 cm/5.0 cm/5.8 cm, P=0.020/0.028 /<0.001), a higher proportion of undifferentiated cancer (63.1% vs. 53.7%, P<0.001), and less intestinal Lauren's type (38.8% vs. 47.4%, P<0.001). The 5-year survival rate of the UTG group was significantly lower than that of the MLG group in stages I/II and III (85.6%/63.1%/34.2% vs. 91.6%/ 69.2%/44.7%, P<0.001/0.028/0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of UTGs has increased over the last two decades at SNUH, but the rate of increase has been greatly reduced since 1992. The UTG group showed a poorer prognosis compared with the MLG group in stages I/II and III.
