Endoscopic Anterior Release and Posterior Total Spondylectomy for Primary Tumors of Spine.
10.4184/jkss.2005.12.3.174
- Author:
Kee Won RHYU
1
;
Yong Koo KANG
;
Jun Gi KIM
;
Deog Gon CHO
;
Jong Min YOO
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea. ykang@vincent.cuk.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Spine;
Primary tumor;
Endoscopic release;
Total spondylectomy
- MeSH:
Allografts;
Blood Vessels;
Follow-Up Studies;
Giant Cell Tumors;
Humans;
Laparoscopy;
Ligation;
Recurrence;
Retrospective Studies;
Sacrum;
Sarcoma, Ewing;
Scoliosis;
Spine*;
Thoracoscopy
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2005;12(3):174-183
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To introduce an endoscopic anterior release and posterior total spondylectomy, and the evaluation of its clinical efficacy. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: A total spondylectomy was introduced for the treatment of primary and metastatic tumors of the spine, with many authors having reported favorable clinical results with its use. Endoscopic surgery has been used for various spinal disorders, including disc diseases or scoliosis, and has been widely used as it offers a minimally invasive technique, with a small surgical incision and very few complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three primary spinal tumor cases were reviewed. The first case was a patient with a Ewing's sarcoma of the sacrum; the second was a giant cell tumor of the sacrum and the last was a giant cell tumor of the T10 vertebra. An endoscopic anterior release was initially performed, including the ligation and release of blood vessels, and soft tissue release, using laparoscopies for the 2 sacral tumors and a thoracoscopy for the thoracic tumor. The total spondylectomy were performed via a posterior approach. In two cases, the one with the Ewing's sarcoma of sacrum and the other with the giant cell tumor of the T10 vertebra, the reconstructions were performed using strut allografts and instrumentations. The average follow-up period was 19 months. RESULTS: Intraoperatively, the endoscopic anterior release made it possible to successful finish the anterior releases, with minimal incisions and blood losses. It also allowed a safer and faster posterior total spondylectomy, without significant complication. At the last follow-up, all patients had favorable clinical results, with no local recurrence in any case or fusions in the two cases that had to undergo reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic anterior release and a posterior total spondylectomy was a favorable surgical procedure for primary tumors of spine. It made possible the safe and efficient finish the anterior release and posterior total excision of the affected vertebrae, using small incisions and with no complications.
