The Effects of Foam Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Lower Limb Varicose Veins.
- Author:
Nak Won BAEK
1
;
Woo Hyung KWUN
;
Sung Su YUN
;
Bo Yang SUH
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea. bysuh@yumail.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Foam sclerotherapy;
Sclerotherapy;
Varicose veins
- MeSH:
Humans;
Incidence;
Lower Extremity*;
Male;
Patient Satisfaction;
Retrospective Studies;
Sclerosing Solutions;
Sclerotherapy*;
Telangiectasis;
Varicose Veins*
- From:Journal of the Korean Society for Vascular Surgery
2006;22(2):108-113
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of foam sclerotherapy, we compared the clinical data and results of foam sclerotherapy with conventional sclerotherapy. METHOD: Ninety-three cases of varicose veins were retrospectively reviewed; these were treated by sclerotherapy from January 2000 to September 2005 (women: 82 cases, men: 12 cases, mean age: 43.7 years old). The enrolled cases were divided into the conventional sclerotherapy (CS) group (n=53) and the foam sclerotherapy (FS) group (n=40) according to the applied technique. We assessed the results with the disappearance scoring scale (DSS) and the satisfaction scoring scale (SSS). RESULT: In DSS, complete disappearance was reported as 28.3% by physicians and 30.2% by the patients in CS group and as 47.5% and 52.5% in the FS group, respectively. On the SSS, a satisfaction score scale above 3 (4: Good, 5: Very good) was reported for 79.1% in the CS group and 90.0% in the FS group, retrospectively. The average amounts of sclerosants used were significantly lower in the FS group (1.2+/-0.4 vials) than in the CS group (2.1+/-0.5 vials)(P=0.001). Post injection complications were retrospectively observed in 16.1% of all the patients, in 20.7% of the CS group and in 10.0% of the FS group. CONCLUSION: Sclerotherapy is a very effective and sufficient treatment for telangiectases or reticular varicose veins. Especially, foam sclerotherapy is more effective than conventional liquid sclerotherapy for the clinical results and the patient satisfaction, and it shows a with lower incidence of complications.
