Clinical Results and Risk Factor Analysis of Surgical Treatment for Esophageal Perforation.
- Author:
Sung Woo CHO
1
;
Ki Woo HONG
;
Shin KIM
;
Hee Sung LEE
;
Hyoung Soo KIM
;
Jae Woong LEE
;
Goang Min CHOI
;
Yoon Cheol SHIN
;
Ho Seung SHIN
;
Won Yong LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Korea. hkw@hallym.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Esophageal perforation;
Risk analysis
- MeSH:
Drainage;
Early Diagnosis;
Emergencies;
Esophageal Perforation;
Esophagectomy;
Esophagus;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Postoperative Complications;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk Factors
- From:The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2008;41(3):347-353
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation is an emergency that requires early diagnosis and effective treatment. A delay in diagnosis and treatment significantly increases morbidity and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Thirty-seven patients with esophageal perforation were surgically treated at our institutions between January 1990 and December 2006. We retrospectively reviewed the results of surgical treatment for esophageal perforation to understand the risk factors affecting survival in patients. RESULT: Patients ranged in age from 21 to 87 years, with an average age of 52.7+/-16.98 years. Thirty-one of the patients were men and six were women. There were 23 patients (62%) with spontaneous perforations, 10 patients (27%) with a traumatic perforation, and 4 patients (11%) with an iatrogenic perforation. The site of esophageal perforation was the cervical esophagus in 5 patients, the thoracic esophagus in 31 patients, and the abdominal esophagus in one patient. Twenty-nine patients underwent primary closure of the perforation and five patients had T-tube drainage. Exclusion-diversion procedures were performed in two patients and an esophagectomy was performed in one patient. There were six cases of mortality (16.22%) and 25 cases of postoperative complications in 15 patients (40.5%). Patients that were treated later than 24 hours after detection of the perforation showed a statistically significant high morbidity and mortality rate (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The most important risk factor of esophageal perforation was the time interval between detection of the perforation and the initiation of treatment. A prompt diagnosis and effective treatment are necessary to decrease morbidity and mortality.
