The effectiveness of spiral computed tomography as a diagnostic tool in pulmonary embolism: Comparison of spiral CT with Ventilation-perfusion scan.
10.4046/trd.1999.46.4.564
- Author:
Jae Hyun KOH
1
;
Eun Young OH
;
Jung Ho PARK
;
Sang Joon PARK
;
Jung Hwan YUN
;
Jung Woong PARK
;
Gee Young SUH
;
Man Pyo CHUNG
;
Kyung Soo LEE
;
O Jung KWON
;
Chong H RHEE
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Pulmonary embolism;
Spiral CT;
Ventilation-Perfusion scan;
Pulmonary angiography
- MeSH:
Angiography;
Arteries;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Diagnosis;
Embolism;
Emphysema;
Female;
Heart Failure;
Humans;
Lung Abscess;
Lung Neoplasms;
Mass Screening;
Mortality;
Pleural Effusion;
Pneumonia;
Pulmonary Embolism*;
Retrospective Studies;
Tomography, Spiral Computed*
- From:Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
1999;46(4):564-573
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: With variable symptoms and nonspecific radiographic appearances, pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent and often undiagnosed cause of mortality and morbidity. The Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) study suggested that the majority of patients undergoing ventilation-perfusion (V-Q) scan would require additional studies to establish or to exclude the diagnosis of PE. Pulmonary angiography has been regarded as gold standard for diagnosis of PE. However, it is an invasive procedure that may be associated with significant notable mo rbidity and mortality. Thus, availability of an accurate, noninvasive screening examination is highly desirable. METHOD: From October 1994 to February 1997, twenty patients (male 13, female 7, range 23-91 years, median 58 years) who were suspected as pulmonary embolism on the basis of clinical evidence and underwent the spiral volumetric computed tomography (spiral CT), were studied retrospectively to evaluate the effectiveness of spiral CT as a diagnostic tool in PE. RESULTS: PE could be excluded with spiral CT in 4 patients; diagnoses of these patients were lung cancer, pneumonia with lung abscess, bilateral pleural effusion due to congestive heart failure, nonspecific pulmonary abnormality retrospectively. One patient who disclosed high probability in V/Q scan, could be diagnosed as pneumonia with lung abscess and underlying emphysema with spiral CT. Among 4 patients who showed intermediate and low probability in V/Q scan, 3 patients could be confirmed as PE with spiral CT. Spiral CT were helpful in 3 patients, in whom V/Q scan could not be performed due to other reasons (e.g. night time, mechanical ventilation) to confirm the diagnosis of PE. Spiral CT could demonstrate embolus above lobar artery level in 11 patients, and up to segmental artery level in 5 patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that spiral CT could allow accurate demonstration of thrombotic clots in centrally localized embolism. Spiral CT could be effective, specific, noninvasive and useful diagnostic screening modality for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
