Aurora Kinase A Is a Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.
- Author:
Hyun Min KOH
1
;
Bo Geun JANG
;
Chang Lim HYUN
;
Young Sill KIM
;
Jin Won HYUN
;
Weon Young CHANG
;
Young Hee MAENG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Aurora kinase A; Colorectal adenocarcinoma; Prognosis
- MeSH: Adenocarcinoma*; Aurora Kinase A*; Chromosomal Instability; Colorectal Neoplasms; Comparative Genomic Hybridization; Disease-Free Survival; Fluorescence; Gene Amplification; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; In Situ Hybridization; Korea; Male; Mitosis; Multivariate Analysis; Phosphotransferases; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models
- From:Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2017;51(1):32-39
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: Aurora kinase A (AURKA), or STK15/BTAK, is a member of the serine/threonine kinase family and plays important roles in mitosis and chromosome stability. This study investigated the clinical significance of AURKA expression in colorectal cancer patients in Korea. METHODS: AURKA protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 151 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma using tissue microarray blocks. We analyzed the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and AURKA expression. In addition, the prognostic significance of various clinicopathological data for progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed. Also we evaluated copy number variations by array comparative genomic hybridization and AURKA gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization in colorectal carcinoma tissues. RESULTS: AURKA gene amplification was found more frequently in the 20q13.2–13.33 gain-positive group than the group with no significant gain on the AURKA-containing locus. AURKA protein expression was detected in 45% of the cases (68/151). Positive staining for AURKA was observed more often in male patients (p = .035) and distally located tumors (p = .021). PFS was shorter in patients with AURKA expression compared to those with low-level AURKA expression (p < .001). Univariate analysis revealed that AURKA expression (p = .001), age (p = .034), lymphatic invasion (p = .001), perineural invasion (p = .002), and TNM stage (p = .013) significantly affected PFS. In a multivariate analysis of PFS, a Cox proportional hazard model confirmed that AURKA expression was an independent and significant prognostic factor in colorectal adenocarcinoma (hazard ratio, 3.944; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: AURKA could serve as an independent factor to predict a poor prognosis in Korean colorectal adenocarcinoma patients.
