Development and Validation of the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale.
10.5999/aps.2016.43.4.365
- Author:
Mohsen NARAGHI
1
;
Mohammad ATARI
Author Information
1. Division of Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Rhinoplasty;
Psychology;
Psychometrics;
Body dysmorphic disorders
- MeSH:
Body Dysmorphic Disorders;
Demography;
Diagnosis;
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders;
Ear;
Humans;
Psychology;
Psychometrics;
Psychopathology;
Reproducibility of Results;
Rhinoplasty*
- From:Archives of Plastic Surgery
2016;43(4):365-370
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: There is a growing concern in the field of aesthetic surgery about the need to measure patients' expectations preoperatively. The present study was designed to develop and validate the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale (EARS), and to compare expectations between rhinoplasty patients with and without body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). METHODS: In total, 162 college students and 20 rhinoplasty candidates were recruited. The measures included the newly developed EARS, a measure of psychopathology, and demographics. The DSM-IV structured clinical interview for BDD was used to confirm the diagnosis in rhinoplasty patients. RESULTS: The EARS was constructed of six items based on their significant content validity. In the scale development phase, Cronbach's alpha was 0.87. The test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale was satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.98) over a four-week period. Scores on the EARS were significantly positively correlated with psychopathological symptoms (r=0.16; P<0.05). Moreover, comparison of EARS scores between BDD (M=25.90, standard deviation [SD]=6.91) and non-BDD rhinoplastic patients (M=15.70, SD=5.27) suggested that BDD patients held significantly higher expectations (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The expectations of aesthetic rhinoplasty patients toward surgery may play a crucial role in their postoperative satisfaction. While the value of patients' expectations is clinically recognized, no empirical study has measured these expectations in a psychometrically sound manner. The current study developed and validated the EARS. It may be easily used as a valid and reliable instrument in clinical and research settings.
