Comparison of Higher-order Aberrations between Eyes with Natural Supervision and Highly Myopic Eyes in Koreans.
- Author:
Min KIM
1
;
Young Gi LEE
;
Kyung Ryul SEO
;
Eung Kweon KIM
;
Hyung Keun LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Higher-order aberrations; Supervision; High myopia
- MeSH: Adult; Cornea/*physiopathology; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological; Female; Humans; Korea/epidemiology; Male; *Myopia/diagnosis/epidemiology/physiopathology; Prevalence; *Refraction, Ocular; Severity of Illness Index; Surface Properties; Visual Acuity
- From:Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;21(2):79-84
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics and investigate the differences of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between the eyes with a natural, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/12 and eyes with highly myopic eyes in Korean adults. METHODS: Thirty-one eyes of 20 subjects with UCVA of 20/12 (Group 1) and 54 eyes of 36 myopic patients with greater than -6 diopters (Group 2) were analyzed for type and magnitude of HOAs across a 6.0 mm pupil. HOAs were measured by Wavescan (VISX, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in natural scotopic conditions and were presented as root-mean-square (RMS: micrometer) in Belle aberration maps. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent (SE) of manifest refraction was -0.15+/-0.25 D (range: +0.37 to -0.50 D) in Group 1 and -7.25+/-0.78 D (range: -6.00 to -9.25 D) in Group 2. The total root-mean-square (RMS) values of HOAs for Group 1 and Group 2 were 0.28+/-0.09 micrometer and 0.27+/-0.087 micrometer, respectively (P>0.05). The mean values of coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration were 0.14+/-0.091 micrometer, 0.14+/-0.089 micrometer, 0.091+/-0.059 micrometer in Group 1 and 0.16+/-0.077 micrometer, 0.14+/-0.073 micrometer, 0.082+/-0.059 micrometer in Group 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study helped establish ocular aberration standards for those with natural supervision and those with highly myopic eyes among Koreans. Individuals with natural supervision had significant amounts of HOAs, and there was no significant difference in the amount of HOAs between the two groups. The index of higher-order aberrations may not be a perfect predictor of the amount of refractive error.
