Safe Approaching Angle and Distance in Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy.
10.4184/jkss.2004.11.4.210
- Author:
Chung Hwan KIM
1
;
Eugene KIM
;
Young Jun CHOI
;
Soo Jung CHOI
;
Joo Hyun KIM
;
Kyoung Hwan KIM
;
Jeong Ho KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Gangneung, Korea. eugene@gnah.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy;
Minimal angle of safe approach;
maximal distance of safe approach
- MeSH:
Diskectomy*;
Female;
Humans;
Intra-Abdominal Fat;
Male;
Obesity;
Peritoneum;
Skin;
Spine
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2004;11(4):210-215
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: A retrograde study, using Computerized Tomography (CT), to evaluate a safer approaching angle and distance for a percutaneous endoscopic discectomy. OBJECTIVES: To measure the safest approaching angle and distance in a percutaneous endoscopic discectomy at each vertebra level in Koreans. LITERATURE REVIEW SUMMARY: Some authors have shown an approaching angle of between 25 to 30 degrees, but reports on Koreans patients are very rare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 200 cases of abdomino-pelvic CT were investigated. The minimal angle of safe approach was composed of two lines, one horizontal line passing through the mid point in the posterior cortex of upper vertebra, with the other extending passed the mid point of posterior cortex in the upper vertebra to the dorsal margin of the retroperitoneal fat or peritoneum. The maximal distance for a safe approach was measured from the end of spinous process to the point where the extended former second line crosses the skin. The minimal angles and maximal distances for safe approaches in males and females, from the right and left sides, at each level of the intervertebral space and in groups according to the BMI were compared. RESULTS: Females had a larger mean minimal angle for a safe approach (14.7 degrees) than that for males (9.6 degrees). However, no differences were observed between the right (12.0 degrees) and left sides (12.4 degrees). At each vertebral level, L2-3(16.4 degrees), L3-4(11.3 degrees) and L4-5(8.8 degrees), significant differences were observed. However, obesity had no influence on the different angles for a safe approach. The maximal distances for safe approaches were 12.9 and 12,6cm in males and female, 12.8 cm in for both of the right and left sides, and 11.8, 13.0 and 13.6cm in L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5, respectively. No differences were observed in any of the above group, but the more obese group had a longer distance. CONCLUSIONS: Females and the upper level of the intervertebral space had larger minimal angles for a safe approach, but there were no differences in relation to gender, direction and obesity. All the maximal distances for safe approaches were the same in males, females, right and left, and at each level of the intervertebral space, but the more obese group had a longer distance. A safer zone for the approach in a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy can be taken, considering the gender, vertebra level and obesity.
