Comparison of Enflurane Consumptions and Costs in Low Flow and High Flow Anesthesia.
10.4097/kjae.1999.37.4.574
- Author:
Jong Kook LEE
1
;
Sang Yong UM
;
Chan Jong CHUNG
;
Young Jhoon CHIN
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Pusan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
Anesthetics, enflurane;
Anesthetic techniques, low flow, high flow
- MeSH:
Anesthesia*;
Anesthetics;
Enflurane*;
Extremities;
Gastrectomy;
Hemodynamics;
Humans;
Nebulizers and Vaporizers;
Respiration;
Syringes
- From:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
1999;37(4):574-579
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The amount and composition of fresh gas flow affect the consumption of inhalational anesthetics. The purpose of this study was to compare the enflurane consumption and economic aspects of low flow and high flow anesthesia. METHODS: Thirty patients, ASA physical status I or II, aged 20 65 yr., scheduled for gastrectomy under inhalational anesthesia, were studied. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups according to the fresh gas flow: O2 500 ml/min (group I); N2O 2 L/min - O2 1 L/min (group II); O2 3 L/min (group III). Anesthesia was maintained in group I by a continuous infusion of liquid enflurane into the inspiratory limb of the breathing circuit, using a syringe pump. In groups II and III, enflurane was administered by a conventional vaporizer. The cumulative dose of liquid enflurane was measured every 10 min during anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters, inspired and expired enflurane concentrations, and enflurane consumptions were measured. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the three groups in hemodynamic changes. The enflurane consumption was significantly less in group I than in groups II and III over time (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low flow anesthesia offers economic advantages over high flow anesthesia.
