Prevalence of dental anomalies among 7- to 35-year-old people in Hamadan, Iran in 2012-2013 as observed using panoramic radiographs.
- Author:
Abbas SHOKRI
1
;
Jalal POOROLAJAL
;
Samira KHAJEH
;
Farhad FARAMARZI
;
Hanieh Mogaver KAHNAMOUI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Anomalies; Dentition; Radiography, Panoramic; Prevalence; Iran
- MeSH: Adult*; Amelogenesis Imperfecta; Anodontia; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dentin; Dentinogenesis Imperfecta; Dentition; Humans; Iran*; Prevalence*; Radiography, Panoramic; Tooth
- From:Imaging Science in Dentistry 2014;44(1):7-13
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of all types and subtypes of dental anomalies among 7- to 35-year-old patients by using panoramic radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1649 people in Hamadan City, in 2012-2013. The prevalence of four types and 12 subtypes of dental anomalies was evaluated by two observers separately by using panoramic radiography. Dental anomalies were divided into four types: (a) shape (including fusion, taurodontism, and dens invagination); (b) number (including hypodontia, oligodontia, and hyperdontia); (c) structure (including amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta, and dentin dysplasia); and (d) position (including displacement, impaction, and dilacerations). RESULTS: The reliability between the two observers was 79.56% according to the Kappa statistics. The prevalence of dental anomalies diagnosed by panoramic radiographs was 29%. Anomalies of position and number were the most common types of abnormalities, and anomalies of shape and structure were the least in both genders. Anomalies of impaction (44.76%), dilacerations (21.11%), hypodontia (15.88%), taurodontism (9.29%), and hyperdontia (6.76%) were the most common subtypes of dental anomalies. The anomalies of shape and number were more common in the age groups of 7-12 years and 13-15 years, respectively, while the anomalies of structure and position were more common among the other age groups. CONCLUSION: Anomalies of tooth position were the most common type of dental anomalies, and structure anomalies were the least in this Iranian population. The frequency and type of dental anomalies vary within and between populations, confirming the role of racial factors in the prevalence of dental anomalies.
