Early Objectified Detection Method of Sensorineural Component in Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome.
- Author:
Jae Kuk YOON
1
;
Hun LEE
;
Nari CHOY
;
Suk Hwan KIM
;
Hyoung Ouk PARK
;
Ji Ho LEE
;
Cheol In YOO
Author Information
1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea. ciyoo62@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hand arm vibration syndrome;
Tactile sense;
Grasp force;
Sensorineural
- MeSH:
Arm;
Fingers;
Hand;
Hand Strength;
Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome;
Vibration
- From:Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
2009;21(2):143-153
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: In order to determine find out the best methods for a more objective detection of neurologic abnormality in early hand arm vibration syndrome(HAVS), early with analyzing the validity of each of the detection methods was analyzed. We evaluated the relationships between the sensorineural stage of Stockholm-revised vibration syndrome classification and the results of several tests. METHODS: 497 workers were investigated for symptom, exposure duration, the types of tools used, and medical history from January 2000 to December 2007. Pain sense threshold, vibrotactile threshold, hand grasp force, finger grasp force, and a finger tapping frequency test were performed by the workers. RESULTS: The grinder(67.3%) was the most commonly used tool and the mean exposure duration was 14.8 years. Although the pain sense and vibrotactile threshold level tended to increase according to sensorineural stage of the Stockholm classification, there was statistically significant difference in the vibrotactile threshold of 125, 250 Hz (p=0.006~0.038) but not in the pain sense threshold. Hand and finger grasp force tended to decrease according to the sensorineural stage of Stockholm classification and there was statistically significant difference(p=0.041,<0.001, 0.034) only on the right hand side. The tapping frequency also generally decreased according to the sensorineural stage of the Stockholm classification and there was statistically significant difference (p=0.002~0.019) only on the left hand side. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no single standardized method that can objectively diagnose the sensorineural component of early HAVS early, the combination of subjective symptoms, the sensorineural stage of Stockholm classification, the pain and vibrotactile threshold test, the hand and finger grasp force, and the finger agility (tapping) test can objectively detect sensorineural component of HAVS early.
