The validity and Reliability on Korean Version of Washington Psychosocial Seizure Inventory: Cross-Cultural Comparisons.
- Author:
Hun Jeong EUN
1
;
Hyun Gi KIM
;
Sun Mi LEE
;
Mal Rye CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Presbyterian Medical Center (Jesus Hospital), Jeonju, Korea. gisungin1004@yahoo.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Epilepsy;
K-WPSI;
Psychosocial;
Cross-cultural
- MeSH:
Canada;
Chile;
Cross-Cultural Comparison*;
Epilepsy;
Finland;
Germany;
Humans;
Japan;
Korea;
Reproducibility of Results*;
Seizures*;
Social Problems;
United States;
Washington*;
Weights and Measures
- From:Journal of Korean Epilepsy Society
2003;7(1):3-15
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was 1) to confirm the reliability and validity of a Korean version of Washington Psychosocial Seizure Inventory (K-WPSI), 2) to investigate the psychosocial functioning of epilepsy patients from Korea, and 3) to compare with other countries. METHODS: The subjects were 302 patients with epilepsy (above 18years). They completed K-WPSI of 132 items including 11 subscales:family background, emotional adjustment, interpersonal adjustment, adjustment to seizures, medical management, overall psychological functioning, Blank, Lie and Rare. We assessed internal consistency, item-subscale correlations, and split-half reliability. Construct validity was assessed by correlating scales of Psychosocial Rating Sheet and K-WPSI. K-WPSI profiles were compared with those from the West Germany, Finland, Canada, the United States, Chile, Dutch, and Japan. RESULTS: The internal consistency estimated by cronbach's alpha coefficient was .934 and split-half reliability coefficient was .876 for adequate reliability (p<.01). Each of subscales in the K-WPSI were high correlated with theoretically similar scales but correlation between theoretically dissimilar subscales was not high. And K-WPSI subscales were significantly related to the PRS subscales. It showed that the Korea epilepsy patients had serious problems in emotional, interpersonal, vocational adjustment, financial status, adjustment to seizure, and overall psycho-social functioning. Comparing the outcomes of various countries, epilepsy patients from Korea and chile had the most serious problem in most areas of psychosocial functioning. CONCLUSIONS: K-WPSI could be a useful test in Korea for reliable determination of the various psychosocial problems of epilepsy patients but modifications of the limitation of the Lie scale may be needed. Comparing the results of other countries, Korea epilepsy patients have been experienced serious psychosocial problem. To solve this problem, social policy and medical and emotional supportive system for persons with epilepsy should need to be established.
