A Survey of Colonoscopic Surveillance After Polypectomy.
- Author:
Dae Kyung SOHN
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Colonoscopy; Surveillance; Colorectal neoplasm; Polypectomy; Guideline
- MeSH: Adenoma; Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Japan; Korea; Polyps; United States; Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:Annals of Coloproctology 2014;30(2):88-92
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Several guidelines have been proposed for surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy. However, some discrepancies still exist between the guidelines and clinical practice. This study was conducted to identify Korean doctors' recommendations for the colonoscopic surveillance interval after polypectomy. METHODS: A survey of the attendees at the symposium of the 64th Annual Congress of the Korean Surgical Society was conducted. When the prepared clinical scenarios were given, attendees answered using a wireless radio-frequency audience response system. All responders' results were automatically counted immediately. Frequencies of different answers to each question were calculated, and our results were compared with those of previous surveys performed using the same questionnaire in the United States or Japan. RESULTS: The number of responder varied from 38 to 41. About 50% of valid responders selected 'follow-up in 3 years' for low-risk lesions, such as a 6-mm hyperplastic polyp, a 6-mm tubular adenoma, or two 6-mm tubular adenomas. Responders most-commonly selected 'follow-up in 1 year' for high-risk lesions, such as a 12-mm tubular adenoma with high grade dysplasia or a 12-mm tubulovillous adenoma. The majority of Korean doctors recommend postpolypectomy colonoscopic surveillance more frequently than American physicians did. CONCLUSION: A discrepancy between the guidelines and clinical practice for the surveillance after polypectomy still exists in Korea. A surveillance program that can be easily and widely applied in clinical practice needs to be established.
