The Usefulness of Multiplanar Reconstruction Images in Preoperative CT Evaluation of Advanced Gastric Cancer.
- Author:
Jin Won JEON
1
;
Kyung Mo SON
;
Tae Yong JEON
;
Dong Heon KIM
;
Mun Sup SIM
;
Suk KIM
;
Jun Woo LEE
;
Suk Hong LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea. JTY3@chollian.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stomach neoplasms;
Computed tomography;
Multiplanar reconstruction image
- MeSH:
Colon;
Head;
Humans;
Liver;
Mesocolon;
Pancreas;
Stomach Neoplasms*
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
2005;68(4):303-310
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images in the preoperative evaluation of advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Multidetector-row CT (MDCT) was performed on 61 patients with advanced gastric cancer, and the coronal and sagittal multiplanar images reconstructed from the transaxial data. The combined axial and MPR images were compared to the axial images alone to determine if the image quality and diagnostic accuracy had been improved. RESULTS: The observed image quality of the combined axial and MPR images, graded relative to the axial image alone, was fair in 22 (36.1%), good in 27 (44.2%), and excellent in 12 cases (19.7%). For the T staging, the diagnostic accuracy of combining the axial and MPR images (75.4%) was higher than that of the axial image alone (70.7%). However, there was no significant difference in the accuracies between the two methods (McNeamar test, P>0.05). For specific regions, the diagnostic accuracies of combining the axial and MPR images and the axial image alone were as follows: 90.2, and 73.8% with antral lesser curvature involvement; 93.4, and 75.4% with antral greater curvature involvement; 83.6, and 73.8% with gastric angle involvement; 96.7, and 88.5% with liver left lobe invasion; 90.2, and 83.6% with pancreas head invasion and 96.7, and 85.2% with colon or mesocolon invasion, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combining the axial and MPR images does not improve the depiction of the T staging compared to the axial image alone in advanced gastric cancer. However, combining the axial and MPR images improved the imaging quality and diagnostic accuracy of specific regions where the delineation of the conventional axial image was insufficient. Therefore, combining the axial and MPR images may be very useful in the preoperative evaluation of advanced gastric cancers.
