What causes the experience of discrimination in non-regular workers?.
10.1186/s40557-017-0192-x
- Author:
Seong Hoon KANG
1
;
Jin Ho SONG
;
Tae Hwan KOH
;
Do Myung PAEK
;
Jong Tae PARK
;
HoSun CHUN
Author Information
1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea. impjt@naver.com.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Discrimination;
Non-regular workers;
Occupational stress
- MeSH:
Discrimination (Psychology)*;
Employment;
Humans;
Korea;
Logistic Models;
Male;
Occupational Health;
Risk Factors;
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
- From:Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
2017;29(1):35-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Discrimination based on type of employment against non-regular workers is still a social issue. However, there are few studies on job factors that affect the discrimination experience in each type of employment or the association between discrimination and health impact indicators. This study examined occupational health characteristics according to discrimination experience and relating factors that affect discrimination experience. METHODS: This study used the 4th Korean Working Conditions Survey (2014) provided by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Among the 50,000 workers, 7731 non-regular wage workers were selected as study population. To examine differences in discrimination experience, we used a t-test on occupational risk factors, occupational stress, occupational characteristics, health impact indicators. To identify the factors that affected discrimination experience, we performed binomial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The discrimination experience rate was significantly higher in male, aged less than 40 years old, above high school graduate than middle school graduate, higher wage level, shorter employment period and larger company's scale. As factors related to discrimination experience, they experienced discrimination more as occupational stress was higher and when they were temporary or daily workers rather than permanent workers, work patterns were not consistent, and the support of boss was low. It showed that physical, musculoskeletal, and mental occupational risk scores and subjective job instability were higher and work environment satisfaction was lower in discrimination experienced group. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that the demographic and occupational factors were complexly related to discrimination experience in non-regular workers. The experience of discrimination had increased when occupational stress was higher, they were temporary or daily workers rather than permanent workers, work patterns were not consistent, and their boss' support was low. Improving various relating factors, (e.g. occupational stresses, employment status and occupational characteristics), this would ultimately expect to improve non-regular workers' discrimination.
