The association between perceived discriminations and well-being in Korean employed workers: the 4th Korean working conditions survey.
10.1186/s40557-017-0205-9
- Author:
Hee Sung LEE
1
;
Guang Hwi KIM
;
Sung Won JUNG
;
June Hee LEE
;
Kyung Jae LEE
;
Joo Ja KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. leekj@schmc.ac.kr.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Perceived discrimination;
Well-being;
Korean working conditions survey(KWCS);
WHO-5 index
- MeSH:
Ageism;
Diagnostic Self Evaluation;
Discrimination (Psychology);
Employment;
Hand;
Logistic Models;
Public Health
- From:Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
2017;29(1):46-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Around the globe, discrimination has emerged as a social issue requiring serious consideration. From the perspective of public health, the impact of discrimination on the health of affected individuals is a subject of great importance. On the other hand, subjective well-being is a key indicator of an individual's physical, mental, and social health. The present study aims to analyze the relationship between Korean employed workers' subjective health and their exposure to perceived discrimination. METHODS: The Fourth Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS, 2014) was conducted on a representative sample of the economically active population aged 15 years or older, who were either employees or self-employed at the time of interview. After removing inconsistent data, 32,984 employed workers were examined in this study. The data included general and occupational characteristics, perceived discrimination, and well-being. Well-being was measured through the WHO-Five index (1998 version). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between perceived discrimination and well-being. RESULT: As a group, employed workers who were exposed to discrimination had a significantly higher likelihood of “poor well-being” than their counterparts who were not exposed to discrimination. More specifically, the workers exposed to age discrimination had an odds ratio(OR) of 1.51 (95% CI: 1.36–1.68), workers exposed to discrimination based on educational attainment had an OR of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.26–1.61), and workers exposed to discrimination based on employment type had an OR of 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48–1.91) with respect to poor well-being. Furthermore, workers exposed to a greater number of discriminatory incidents were also at a higher risk of “poor well-being” than their counterparts who were exposed to fewer such incidents. More specifically, the workers with three exposures to discrimination had an OR of 2.60 (95% CI: 1.92–3.53), the workers with two such exposures had an OR of 1.69 (95% CI: 1.44–1.99), and the workers with one such exposure had an OR of 1.32 (95% CI: 1.20–1.45). CONCLUSION: The present study found that discrimination based on age, educational attainment, or employment type put workers at a higher risk of “poor well-being,” and that the greater the exposure to discrimination, the higher the risk of poor well-being.
