Relation of Postoperative Deformity with Clinical Results in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Spinal Stenosis.
10.4184/jkss.2003.10.4.297
- Author:
Kyu Yeol LEE
1
;
Sung Keun SHON
;
Myung Jin LEE
;
Sang Kook KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea. ylee@daunet.donga.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Degenerative lumbar scoliosis;
Spinal stenosis;
Scoliotic angle;
Lordotic angle
- MeSH:
Congenital Abnormalities*;
Decompression;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Retrospective Studies;
Scoliosis*;
Spinal Canal;
Spinal Stenosis*
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2003;10(4):297-302
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the clinical results, with the correction of the lumbar lordotic and scoliotic angles, in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients, with spinal stenosis, who underwent an operation. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Few studies have compared the postoperative lordotic angle with the clinical results in degenerative lumbar scoliosis, with spinal stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Out of 68 cases, where the patients underwent posterior decompression, pedicle screw fixation and fusion, due to the degenerative lumbar scoliosis with spinal stenosis, between February 1997 and February 2001, 59 cases, with the possible follow-ups for over 2 year, were studied and are herein reported. The decompression was carried out over a segment that showed the neurological symptom and occlusion of the spinal canal or the compression on the nerve root observed on CT or MRI scans. The pedicle screw fixation and fusion were carried out over the segment that received the decompression. The average age of the patients was 63.4, ranging from 51 to 76 years, and the average follow-up period was 38, ranging from 24 to 56 months. The measurements were performed in relation to the vertebral rotation, scoliotic and lumbar lordotic angles preoperatively, postoperatively and at the time of the final follow-ups, respectively. The clinical results were classified by the Kirkaldy-Willis questionnaire, and the statistical calculations performed through chi-squared and Pearson's correlation tests. RESULTS: The average lumbar scoliotic angles preoperatively, postoperatively and at the time of the final follow-ups were 15.7+/-4.9, 8.9+/-3.1 and 10.8+/-4.7 degrees, respectively. The average lumbar lordotic angles were 14.2+/-6.1, 20.1+/-7.3 and 19.4+/-7.2 degrees, respectively. The vertebral rotation degrees were 0.88, 0.62 and 0.64, respectively. The clinical results by the Kirkaldy- Willis questionnaire indicated over 73% satisfactory results, showing 9 excellent, 34 good, 13 fair and 3 poor cases. The lumbar lordotic angle was statistically correlated with the clinical results (p=0.04), while the scoliotic angle (p=0.41) and the vertebral rotation degree (p=0.29) were not. The scoliotic and lordotic angles had negative correlations, but these were not statistically significant (r=-0.09 and p>0.05). CONCLUSION: It is my belief that the correction of the lumbar lordotic angle, in patients having spinal stenosis, with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, is associated with an improvement in the clinical results.
