Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Outcome After a Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review.
- Author:
Wilhelmina S VISSER
1
;
Wouter W TE RIELE
;
Djamila BOERMA
;
Bert VAN RAMSHORST
;
Henderik L VAN WESTREENEN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Rectal neoplasms; Fecal incontinence; Pelvic floor
- MeSH: Biofeedback, Psychology; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Manometry; Pelvic Floor*; Quality of Life; Rectal Neoplasms; Rehabilitation*
- From:Annals of Coloproctology 2014;30(3):109-114
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Impaired functional outcome is common after a low anterior resection (LAR). Pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) might improve functional outcome after a LAR. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of PFR in improving functional outcome. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the terms fecal incontinence, colorectal neoplasm/surgery, LAR, rectal cancer, anterior resection syndrome, bowel habit, pelvic floor, training, therapy, physical therapy, rehabilitation and biofeedback. Of the 125 identified records, 5 articles were included. RESULTS: The 5 included studies reported on 321 patients, of which 286 patients (89%) underwent pelvic floor training. Three studies included patients with anterior resection syndrome after a LAR while the remaining studies included a series of patients after a LAR. Functional outcome was mostly assessed by using the Wexner incontinence scale. Quality of life was assessed in one study, and in three studies, rectal manometry was performed. After PFR, the functional outcome was improved in four studies, as was the quality of life. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated that PFR is useful for improving the functional outcome after a LAR. The data are extracted from studies of limited quality, but the available evidence points to the effectiveness of the procedure.
