Pericentric Inversion of the X Chromosome in a Male with Azoospermia and in the Family of a Pregnant Female Carrier.
- Author:
Bom Yi LEE
1
;
Hyun Mee RYU
;
Moon Hee LEE
;
Ju Yeon PARK
;
Jin Woo KIM
;
Joong Shik LEE
;
Hye Ok KIM
;
Min Hyung KIM
;
So Yeon PARK
Author Information
1. Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Seoul, Korea. paranip@yahoo.co.kr
- Publication Type:Case Report
- Keywords:
Pericentric inversion of X chromosome;
Azoospermia;
Prenatal diagnosis
- MeSH:
Adult;
Azoospermia;
Biopsy;
Cytogenetics;
Estradiol;
Fathers;
Female;
Fetus;
Humans;
Incidence;
Karyotype;
Lifting;
Male;
Maternal Age;
Phenotype;
Pregnancy;
Pregnant Women;
Prenatal Diagnosis;
Prolactin;
Siblings;
Spermatocytes;
Spermatozoa;
Testis;
Testosterone;
X Chromosome
- From:Journal of Genetic Medicine
2008;5(2):139-144
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
We report on two cases of pericentric inversion of X chromosome. The cases were found in a 40-year- old man with azoospermia and in a family of a 38-year-old pregnant woman. The first case with 46,Y,inv(X)(p22.1q27) had concentrations of LH, prolactin, estradiol, and testosterone that were within normal ranges; however, FSH levels were elevated. Testis biopsy revealed maturation arrest at the primary and secondary spermatocytes without spermatozoa. There were no microdeletions in the 6 loci of chromosome Y. For the second case, the cytogenetic study of the pregnant woman referring for advanced maternal age and a family history of inversion X chromosome was 46,X,inv(X)(p22.11q27.2). The karyotype of her fetus was 46,X,inv(X)(p22.1q27). Among other family members, the karyotypes of an older sister in pregnancy and her fetus were 46,X,inv(X)(p22.11q27.2), and 46,Y,inv(X), respectively. The proband's father was 46,Y,inv(X)(p22.11q27.2). All carriers in the family discussed above were fertile and phenotypically normal. In addition, the ratio of inactivation of inv(X) by RBG-banding was discordant between the two sisters, with the older sister having only 4.1% of cells carrying inactivated inv(X) while the proband had a 69.5% incidence of late replicating inv(X). Therefore, we suggest that the cause of azoospermia in the first case might be related to inversion X chromosome with positional effect. Also, the family of the second case showing normal phenotype of the balanced inv(X) might be not affected any positional effect of genes.
