On the marginal fidelity of all-ceramic core using CAD/CAM system.
- Author:
Dong Keun KIM
1
;
Ju Hwan LIM
;
Heon Song LIM
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Korea. navydent@kangnung.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
CAD/CAM system;
In-ceram core;
Marginal fidelity;
Contact digitizer;
Machinne tool
- MeSH:
Dentistry
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2003;41(1):20-34
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Novel methods producing supplementary and prosthetic material by cutting or discharge processing via computer design have been proposed as alternatives for traditional casting methods and are being utilized for commercial purposes. The CAD/CAM system used in dentistry can be classified into three-dimensional input of target values, restoration design, and material processing. The marginal fidelity in production of In-Ceram core has important clinical implications and is a key consideration issue in CAD/CAM production as well. Through this research, the author arrived at the following conclusion after conducting comparison analysis of marginal fidelities between the In-Ceram core produced via CAD/CAM and that produced through the traditional method: 1. In the cases of mesial, distal, and lingual margins, the core margins via CAD/CAM produced lower values than those via the traditional method, but the differences were found to be statistically insignificant. 2. In the case of labial flange, the core margins via CAD/CAM produced lower values than those via the traditional method and the differences were found to be statistically significant. (p<0.05) 3. In comparision with overall marginal fidelity, the core margins via CAD/CAM produced lower values than those via the traditional method, but the differences were found to be statistically insignificant. 4. Among the core margins produced via the traditional method did not have statistically significant differences but for those produced via CAD/CAM had statistically significant differences between labial and lingual sides and between labial and mesial sides. (p<0.05)
