Safety and Efficacy of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Colpopexy.
- Author:
Joo Myung KIM
1
;
Jun Sik HONG
;
Ki Heon LEE
;
Kwan Young JOO
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Cheil Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. dr66205@freechal.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Uterine prolapse;
Sacrospinous colpopexy;
Complications;
Success
- MeSH:
Amputation;
Buttocks;
Cystocele;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Hysterectomy;
Hysterectomy, Vaginal;
Intraoperative Complications;
Ligaments;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care);
Pelvic Organ Prolapse;
Prolapse;
Rectocele;
Urinary Bladder;
Uterine Prolapse
- From:Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2005;48(1):162-168
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the success rate and complications of transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for symptomatic uterine/vault prolapse when performed by one surgeon. METHODS: Between march 1996 and march 2002, 105 women with a symptomatic uterine/vault prolapse were treated with transvaginal sacrospinous ligament colpopexy at samsung cheil hospital. Primary outcome measures were complications (acute and long term) and success rate, with failure defined as any degree of uterine/vault prolapse requiring repeat operation, any degree of symptomatic isolated uterine/vault prolapse, any pelvic organ prolapse at or beyond the introitus. Statistical analysis was performed using simple descriptive technique. RESULTS: During the study period, 105 transvaginal sacrospinous ligament colpopexy were performed: 41 with vaginal hysterectomy, 38 without hysterectomy, 25 for post-hysterectomy vault prolapse and 1 cervical amputation. The mean duration of follow-up was 17.7 months (0-66) There were no acute hemorrhage and no deaths. There were four intraoperative complications - three rectal wall injury and one bladder wall injury. There was a complaints of postoperative right buttock pain in 8 of the 105 procedure (7.6%), with this persisting on a chronic basis in 2 patients (1.9%). Postoperatively, there were 11 patients with uterine/valut prolapse, 4 with a cystocele and 1 with a rectocele. Of these 105, there were 6 failures (5.7%). CONCLUSION: Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for the correction of uterine/vault prolapse, when performed by a surgeon experienced in the procedure, is safe and effective surgical procedure and rare major complications.
