Pregnancy Outcome of Cervical Incompetence in Twin Versus Singleton Pregnancies.
- Author:
Soo Hyun NAM
1
;
Ji Eun LEE
;
Suk Joo CHOI
;
Soo Young OH
;
Jong Hwa KIM
;
Cheong Rae ROH
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. crroh@smc.samsung.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Twin pregnancy;
Cervical incompetence;
Cerclage
- MeSH:
Amnion;
Diagnosis;
Female;
Gestational Age;
Humans;
Incidence;
Labor Stage, First;
Medical Records;
Parity;
Pregnancy;
Pregnancy Outcome*;
Pregnancy*;
Pregnancy, Twin;
Retrospective Studies;
Ultrasonography
- From:Korean Journal of Perinatology
2007;18(2):149-153
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and clinical features of cervical incompetence between singleton and twin pregnancies in women with newly diagnosed cervical incompetence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 64 women who were diagnosed with cervical incompetence for the first time during pregnancy and delivered between 1994 and 2004. Cervical incompetence was defined by the presence of painless cervical dilatation during mid-trimester with either bulging amniotic membranes through the external cervical os or shortened cervical length (<2 cm) with funneling on transvaginal ultrasound. RESULTS: The incidence of cervical incompetence which was diagnosed for the first time during pregnancy was 0.16% (54/33, 176) in singleton pregnancies and 1.23% (10/813) in twin pregnancies. Multiparity or a history of preterm delivery was more common in the singleton compared to the twin pregnancies. The median gestational age at diagnosis was similar in the two groups. In the patients who had undergone emergent cerclage, twin pregnancies had more advanced cervical dilatation [median (range); 3.0 (2.0~5.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0~4.0) cm, p<0.05] and effacement [median (range); 75 (50~100) vs. 50 (10~100) %, p<0.05] compared to the singleton pregnancies. After emergent cerclage, gestational age at delivery was earlier in the twin pregnancies [median (range); 24.8 (23.1~30.6) vs. 35.3 (16.4~41.1) weeks, p<0.05] than in the singleton pregnancies. CONCLUSION: The incidence of cervical incompetence in twin pregnancies was seven times greater than in singleton pregnancies. Although the onset of cervical incompetence was not different in the groups, prolongation of pregnancy, after emergent cerclage, was less likely in the twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies, due to a more advanced cervical change at the time of diagnosis.
