Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by Gastric Cancer Patients.
- Author:
Byung Joo CHAE
1
;
Byung Joo SONG
;
Sin Sun KIM
;
Sung Keun KIM
;
Kyong Hwa JUN
;
Kyo Yung SONG
;
Hyung Min CHIN
;
Wook KIM
;
Cho Hyun PARK
;
Seung Man PARK
;
Keun Woo LIM
;
Seung Nam KIM
;
Hae Myung JEON
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. hmjeon@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM);
Gastric cancer;
Survey
- MeSH:
Asian Continental Ancestry Group;
Complementary Therapies*;
Dietary Supplements;
Education;
Fatigue;
Herbal Medicine;
Humans;
Intention;
Oral Medicine;
Panax;
Stomach Neoplasms*
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
2007;72(5):369-378
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has recently been spotlighted, and CAM can be defined as methods for treating diseases or ways to maintain physical health that out lie outside the boundaries of conventional medicine. We have conducted research to determine the status of CAM usage among Korean gastric cancer patients and their attitudes toward it, to determine what better can be done about CAM. METHODS: We surveyed those patients in St. Mary Hospital who were diagnosed to gastric cancer and who volunteered to participate in this study. The survey consists of 38 questions and each question covered personal characteristics information as to whether they have used CAM, whether they were satisfied after taking CAM and their intentions for re-use. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients answered the survey. 80 patients (41%) experienced CAM for the purpose of remedying their gastric cancer. The top leading CAM was dietary supplement for 52% of the patients, ginseng for 26% of the patients and Chinese herbal medicine for 10.8% of the patients. 54 patients (67.5%) were satisfied with the results of the CAM and they said that it had an effect on fatigue (45%). The statistics showed positive correlation between the level of education and the CAM users (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The percentage of patients using CAM among the gastric cancer patients was high, up to 41%. Most of these patients wanted more information and discussion with their physicians about CAM therapies. The interesting thing was that most of the CAM was oral medicine. Based on our findings, research on the safety and effectiveness of CAM is required.
