Factors Influencing Corneal Flap Thickness in Laser In Situ Keratomileusis with a Femtosecond Laser.
- Author:
Chan Young KIM
1
;
Ji Hye SONG
;
Kyoung Sun NA
;
So Hyang CHUNG
;
Choun Ki JOO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Corneal flap thickness; Femtosecond laser; Laser in situ keratomileusis
- MeSH: Adult; Cornea/*surgery; Female; Humans; *Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ; *Lasers, Excimer; Male; Myopia/physiopathology/surgery; Postoperative Period; Prospective Studies; Refraction, Ocular; *Surgical Flaps; Visual Acuity; Young Adult
- From:Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2011;25(1):8-14
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate factors responsible for the variability between intended and achieved corneal-flap thickness during femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized, case study was performed on 35 eyes of 18 consecutive patients who underwent LASIK surgery using the 60 kHz femtosecond laser microkeratome. Eyes were assigned to three different thickness groups, with 110-, 120-, or 130-microm cut depths. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was used to assess the morphology of 35 LASIK flaps at postoperative one week postoperatively. The flap thickness was assessed at seven measuring points across each flap. Patient age, preoperative spherical equivalent, manual keratometry, preoperative central pachymetry, and regional variability of the cornea were evaluated to determine where they influenced the achieved corneal flap thickness. RESULTS: Cuttings of all flaps were easily performed without any intraoperative complications. Flap-thickness measurements had a mean of 115.21 +/- 4.98 microm (intended thickness, 110 microm), 121.90 +/- 5.79 microm (intended, 120 microm), and 134.38 +/- 5.04 microm (intended, 130 microm), respectively. There was no significant difference between the 110-microm and 120-microm groups when compared with the 130-microm group (one-way analysis of variance test, p > 0.05). Patients' age, preoperative spherical equivalent, manual keratometry, and preoperative central pachymetry did not affect the achieved flap thickness (Pearson correlations test, p > 0.05). The reproducibility of flap thickness in the central 1.5-mm radius area was more accurate than that in the peripheral 3.0 to 4.0-mm radius area (paired samples t-test, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK is likely to reproduce a reliable thickness of the corneal flap, which is independent of corneal shape factors or refractive status. Future studies should focus on variations in corneal biomechanical factors, which may also play an important role in determining flap thickness.
