Fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro.
10.4041/kjod.2013.43.4.186
- Author:
Dave Lie Sam FOEK
1
;
Enver YETKINER
;
Mutlu OZCAN
Author Information
1. Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Publication Type:In Vitro ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Lingual;
Bonding;
Relapse;
Retention
- MeSH:
Adenine;
Adhesives;
Animals;
Carbamates;
Cats;
Collodion;
Composite Resins;
Deoxycytidine;
Drug Combinations;
Fatigue;
Humans;
Incidence;
Incisor;
Organophosphonates;
Periodontal Ligament;
Polyethylene;
Polyethylenes;
Polymethyl Methacrylate;
Quinolones;
Recurrence;
Retention (Psychology);
Silicones;
Splints;
Stainless Steel;
Thiazoles;
Tooth;
Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination
- From:The Korean Journal of Orthodontics
2013;43(4):186-192
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro. METHODS: Roots of human mandibular central incisors were covered with silicone, mimicking the periodontal ligament, and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate. The specimens (N = 50), with two teeth each, were randomly divided into five groups (n = 10/group) according to the retainer materials: (1) Interlig (E-glass), (2) everStick Ortho (E-glass), (3) DentaPreg Splint (S2-glass), (4) Ribbond (polyethylene), and (5) Quad Cat wire (stainless steel). After the recommended adhesive procedures, the retainers were bonded to the teeth by using flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow). The teeth were subjected to 10,00,000 cyclic loads (8 Hz, 3 - 100 N, 45degrees angle, under 37 +/- 3degrees C water) at their incisoproximal contact, and debonding forces were measured with a universal testing machine (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Failure sites were examined under a stereomicroscope (x40 magnification). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: All the specimens survived the cyclic loading. Their mean debonding forces were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The DentaPreg Splint group (80%) showed the highest incidence of complete adhesive debonding, followed by the Interlig group (60%). The everStick Ortho group (80%) presented predominantly partial adhesive debonding. The Quad Cat wire group (50%) presented overlying composite detachment. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclic loading did not cause debonding. The retainers presented similar debonding forces but different failure types. Braided stainless steel wire retainers presented the most repairable failure type.
