The Height and Volume of Medial Longitudinal Arch in Normal and Painful Feet.
- Author:
Woo Chun LEE
1
;
Jeong Seok MOON
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea. wclee@seoulpaik.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Foot;
Medial longitudinal arch;
Metatarsalgia;
Heel pain;
3-D scan
- MeSH:
Foot*;
Head;
Heel;
Humans;
Metatarsal Bones;
Metatarsalgia
- From:Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society
2007;11(1):8-12
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in simple radiographic parameters and results of 3-D scan among normal and patient groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy subjects in each group were studied. Control group consisted of subjects without plantar foot pain (normal group), and two patient groups were one with plantar forefoot pain (metatarsalgia group), the other with plantar heel pain (heel pain group). Simple radiographic parameters were obtained and 3-D scan was done with foot scanner (Nexscan, K&I, Korea) and The height and volumn of the space under the medial longitudinal arch was analyzed (Enfoot, K&I, Korea). These parameters were compared and correlation between radiological parameters and results of the 3-D scan were studied. RESULTS: The results of all parameters distributed normally. There was no signigicant differences among the groups in radiological parameters (talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch angle and height of the talar head in standing lateral radiograph) and arch height and arch volumn on 3-D scan. There were statistically significant correlations between radiological and 3-D scan results. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that there is no significant differences in medial longitudinal arch height and volumn among normal and different patient groups and there are variety of arch height in patients with similar symptoms.
