The Comparison of the Results Between AO Internal Fixator (Long lever-arm) and Screw-Rod System (Short lever-arm) Through Posterior Approach in Unstable Thoracolumbar Fractures.
10.4184/jkss.2008.15.1.23
- Author:
Yung Tae KIM
1
;
Moon Chan KIM
;
Seok Joong KANG
;
Chang Wan KIM
;
Sung Yoon KIM
;
Dong Wook SOHN
;
Choon Sung LEE
;
Dong Ho LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ytkim2@amc.seoul.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Thoracolumbar fractures;
AO internal fixator;
Screw-rod system;
Transpedicular bone graft
- MeSH:
Body Height;
Congenital Abnormalities;
Humans;
Internal Fixators;
Prospective Studies;
Spinal Canal;
Surgical Procedures, Operative;
Transplants
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2008;15(1):23-30
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the outcome of posterior reduction and fixation with the AO internal fixator and with the screw-rod system in unstable thoracolumbar fractures and to investigate differences in effectiveness between the two methods. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: In unstable thoracolumbar fractures, fixation with the AO internal fixator is an effective method for posterior reduction. However, the results of correction are quite variable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 51 patients with unstable thoracolumbar fractures who underwent correction through posterior approach between 1997 and 2003. We divided the patients into two groups: Patients in Group A (25 cases) were treated with the AO internal fixator, and patients in Group B (26 cases) were treated with the screw-rod system. We added transpedicular bone grafts for 17 patients in Group A. We evaluated correction of deformity (anterior and posterior height of vertebral body, sagittal index, disc height), loss of correction, spinal canal clearance, and neurological recovery. RESULTS: Comparing correction of deformity, we saw better results in Group A than in Group B in regards to sagittal index and anterior height of vertebral body. However, we saw a higher degree of correction loss in the anterior height of the vertebral body in Group A. We grafted autogenous bone into the fracture site by transpedicular approach for 17 patients in Group A. We saw less correction loss in the anterior vertebral body height and sagittal index. In regard to spinal canal clearance, we saw better results in Group A (18%) than in Group B (10%). As for neurological recovery, we could not find any statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Through an operative procedure, we could achieve better results in restoration of anterior vertebral height and canal clearance with the AO internal fixator system. Further study is necessary to keep the reduced state of vertebral height.
