A Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Characteristics between.
- Author:
Jeong Soo LIM
1
;
Chang Yong SOHN
;
Ok Suk BAE
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Diverticular disease;
Colon
- MeSH:
Appendicitis;
Colon;
Diagnosis;
Diverticulum;
Female;
Humans;
Incidence;
Male;
Retrospective Studies*
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology
1999;15(3):219-226
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to obtain better clinical insights and therapeutic approaches to the diverticular diseases of the colon by identifying the clinical characteristics of the right and left colonic diverticular diseases. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of 68 colonic diverticular patients treated between August of 1986 and July of 1997. Right colonic diverticular disease was present in 55 patients, left side disease in eight patients, and bilateral disease in five patients. According to the location of the colonic diverticular disease, various clinical parameters such as the nature of the diverticula, age and sex, diagnostic accuracy, and methods of treatment were assessed. RESULTS: The average age of 68 patients in this study was 50.94 years. Fifty two patients were male and sixteen were female. The disease was far more common in the right colon (80.9%) than the left colon (11.7%) and the right colonic diverticular disease was the most common source of confusion in diagnosis from acute appendicitis. Conservative management was tried in 30 of 35 patients above age 50 and obtained a good result without any complication. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a tendency toward increased incidence of annual colonic diverticular diseases in this study. The right colonic diverticular disease was far more common than the left side disease and the disease was more common in the male. In patients above age 50, initial conservative management is a reasonable approach, although early surgical exploration might be better in younger patients. Acute appendicitis should be ruled out before any treatment decision was made.
