Analysis of evaluation results for the implementation of Specification for testing of quality control in medical X-ray diagnostic equipment (WS 76-2020)
10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2025.04.015
- VernacularTitle:《医用X射线诊断设备质量控制检测规范》（WS 76—2020）标准实施评估结果分析
- Author:
Ling ZHANG
1
;
Weidong ZHU
1
;
Hezheng ZHAI
2
;
Tingting YE
3
;
Tinggui HE
1
;
Wanyan CHENG
1
;
Cheng ZHANG
1
;
Chunxu YIN
1
Author Information
1. The Second People's Hospital of Anhui, Hefei 230041, China.
2. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin 300192, China.
3. The Third People`s Hospital of Hefei, Hefei 230022, China.
- Publication Type:OriginalArticles
- Keywords:
X-ray diagnostic equipment;
Quality control;
Standard evaluation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health
2025;34(4):559-565
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the overall implementation of the WS 76-2020 standard in Anhui Province, China and identify and analyze the factors affecting the implementation of the standard, and to provide a basis for the effective implementation and revision of WS 76-2020. Methods According to the requirements of the Notice of the Department of Regulations in National Health Commission on the 2024 assessment of implementation of mandatory standards, an evaluation of radiological health standards was organized and conducted in Anhui Province. The evaluation involved the three dimensions of standard implementation status, technical content of the standards, and effectiveness of standard implementation, with subsequent data analysis. Results The total evaluation score for WS 76-2020 was 87.83 points, indicating that the standard effectively guided the quality control testing of medical X-ray diagnostic equipment. However, stability testing was either underutilized or not performed in practice. The qualified rate of X-ray diagnostic equipment in the province was 94.26%, with equipment performance issues identified as the leading contributor to non-qualified instances. Expert discussions highlighted recommendations particularly concerning the operability, applicability, and scientific rigor of the standard. Conclusion It is recommended to strengthen the dissemination and training for the standard, promote medical institutions to voluntarily conduct stability testing, provide supplementary clarifications or revisions for problematic clauses, and standardize quality control testing techniques for radiological diagnostic equipment.
