Effect of visual training equipment combined with conventional corrective treatment on children with ametropic amblyopia
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2025.10.06
- VernacularTitle:常规矫正治疗结合视觉训练仪对屈光不正性弱视患儿的效果
- Author:
Yifan LIU
1
;
Sisi XU
1
;
Tao CHEN
1
;
Mengke CUI
1
;
Dongmei ZHU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
visual training equipment;
corrective treatment;
ametropic amblyopia;
children
- From:
International Eye Science
2025;25(10):1580-1584
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
AIM: To explore the clinical application effect of visual training equipment combined with conventional corrective treatment on children with ametropic amblyopia(AMA).METHODS: Prospective randomized control study. A total of 188 children(376 eyes)with AMA treated in our hospital from June 2021 to December 2022 were selected, and they were divided into two groups using a random number table. The conventional correction group(94 cases, 188 eyes)received conventional correction treatment, while the visual training group(94 cases, 188 eyes)received visual training equipment combined with conventional correction treatment, both lasted for 12 mo. The best corrected visual acuity, diopter, eye accommodation function, adverse reactions, amblyopia recurrence rates, and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups at 6 and 12 mo after treatment.RESULTS:The two groups each had 8 cases(16 eyes)detached, the rate of loss to follow-up was 8.5%, and 86 cases(172 eyes)were included in each group. There were statistically significant differences in the best corrected visual acuity, diopter, amplitude of accommodation, accommodation facility and accommodative lag between the two groups of children before and after treatment(all P<0.05). The total effective rate of the visual training group(98.8%)was higher than that of the conventional correction group(91.9%; P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total effective rate of clinical efficacy between the two groups in different age groups and different degrees of amblyopia(all P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of redness and swelling between the two groups(P>0.05). The recurrence rate of amblyopia in the visual training group(1.2%)was lower than that in the conventional correction group(8.1%; P<0.05).CONCLUSION: The combination of visual training equipment and conventional correction therapy has a significant clinical effect on children with AMA, which can effectively correct visual acuity, adjusting diopter and improve eye accommodation function, and recurrence rate of amblyopia is low and safety is high.
