The burden of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is felt worldwide with increasing number of diagnosed cases. A recommended treatment option for a longer remission is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after chemotherapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline antibiotic, either Idarubicin or Daunorubicin. In the Philippines, Doxorubicin, a cheaper and more accessible option for chemotherapy among those who have financial incapabilities. It is no longer part of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendation for use however; it remains to be part of the Philippine National Clinical Practice Guideline in the treatment of AML. This leads us to wonder what the difference in outcome of patients who have received doxorubicin compared to those who received Idarubicin as induction chemotherapy.

This is a retrospective cohort study. Data was collected through chart review of AML patients admitted for induction chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier computation. The t-test for two proportions was used to compare outcomes between the two groups.

This study included 65 participants, 55 received idarubicin and 10 received doxorubicin. The average age of diagnosis in the Idarubicin group is 41.38 years, and 34.9 years in the Doxorubicin group. Majority of participants are females (58.18% vs 80%) and married (67.27% vs 60%). They are predominantly nonsmokers (89.09% vs 80%), with no maintenance medications (61.82% vs 70%), and comorbidities (70.91% vs 90%). There was no significant difference in the median overall survival of both groups (507 days vs 428 days, logrank test = 0.74).

Outcomes of this study leads us to conclude that Doxorubicin is not inferior to Idarubicin in terms of survival.