Polymerization behavior and thermal characteristics of two new composites at five temperatures: refrigeration to preheating.
10.4047/jap.2011.3.4.216
- Author:
Tahereh Sadat JAFARZADEH-KASHI
;
Marzieh MIRZAII
;
Mohmmad ERFAN
;
Akbar FAZEL
;
Solmaz ESKANDARION
;
Vahid RAKHSHAN
- Publication Type:In Vitro ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Dental Materials;
Composite Resins;
Polymerization;
Differential Thermal Analysis;
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- MeSH:
Calorimetry, Differential Scanning;
Composite Resins;
Dental Materials;
Differential Thermal Analysis;
Hot Temperature;
Linear Models;
Polymerization;
Polymers;
Refrigeration
- From:The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
2011;3(4):216-220
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Heat of composite polymerization (HP) indicates setting efficacy and temperature increase of composite in clinical procedures. The purpose of this in vitro experimental study was to evaluate the effects of 5 temperatures on HP of two new composites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From each material (Core Max II [CM] and King Dental [KD]), 5 groups of 5 specimens each were prepared and their total HPs (J/gr) were measured and recorded, at one of the constant temperatures 0degrees C, 15degrees C, 23degrees C, 37degrees C and 60degrees C (2 x 5 x 5 specimens) using a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyzer. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA, a Tukey's test, an independent-samples t-test, and a linear regression analysis (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: No polymerization reactions occurred at 0degrees C; then this temperature was excluded from statistical analyses. The mean HP of the remaining 20 KD specimens was 20.5 +/- 14.9 J/gr, while it was 40.7 +/- 12.9 J/gr for CM. The independent-samples t-test showed that there were significant differences between the HP of the two materials at the temperatures 15degrees C (P=.0001), 23degrees C (P=.0163), 37degrees C (P=.0039), and 60degrees C (P=.0106). Linear regression analysis showed statistically significant correlations between environment temperatures and HP of CM (R2=0.777). CONCLUSION: Using CM is advantageous over conventional composite because of its better polymerization capacity. However due to its high HP, further studies should assess its temperature increase in vivo. Preheating KD is recommended. Refrigerating composites can negatively affect their polymerization potential.
