Comparison of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in oblique supine-lithotomy position and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole stones
10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2025.02.011
- VernacularTitle:斜仰卧-截石位下微小通道经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜碎石术治疗最大径1~2 cm肾下盏结石的疗效比较
- Author:
Haitao LIU
1
;
Hengcheng ZHU
1
;
Kang YANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 443002, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy;
flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy;
Needle-perc;
lower-pole stones;
oblique supine-lithotomy position
- From:
Journal of Modern Urology
2025;30(2):148-151
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microPCNL) using Needle-perc in the oblique supine-lithotomy position for treating 1—2 cm lower-pole stones (LPSs)，by comparing it with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL)，so as to identify an effective surgical method for LPSs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 56 patients with isolated LPSs of 1—2 cm treated in our hospital during Jan.and Dec.2023.Patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment method：FURL (n=31) and microPCNL (n=25).General information and perioperative data were compared between the two groups. Results: All operations were successfully completed.The operation time was shorter in the microPCNL group than in the FURL group \[(46.5±10.1) min vs.(73.5±18.9) min，P<0.001\].Stone-free rate (SFR) was 92.0% in the microPCNL group and 71.0% in the FURL group (P=0.026).There were no significant differences in the average fall of hemoglobin level，serumc creatinine change level，hospitalization time and postoperative fever between the two groups. Conclusion: MicroPCNL in oblique supine-lithotomy position is a safe and effective treatment for 1-2 cm LPSs，with a higher SFR compared to FURL.
