Construction of quality control evaluation indicators for common diseases surveillance among students
10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025171
- VernacularTitle:学生常见病监测质量控制评价指标的构建
- Author:
CUI Mengjie, MENG La, MA Qi, XING Yi
1
Author Information
1. Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing (100191) , China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Disease；Population surveillance；Quality control；Delphi technique；Students
- From:
Chinese Journal of School Health
2025;46(6):894-898
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct a quality control evaluation indicator system for the surveillance of common diseases among students, so as to provide a reference for the quality control of surveillance projects.
Methods:Based on literature review and expert interviews, a preliminary framework and candidate indicators were developed from June to August in 2024. Twenty domain experts participated in two rounds of Delphi consultations conducted via email, providing importance ratings, judgment basis, familiarity levels, and feasibility assessments for each indicator. And a quality control evaluation indicator system for the surveillance of common diseases among students was ultimately constructed.
Results:The consulted experts aged 33-53, with an average age of (45.25±5.03) years, were from government health administration departments( n =1), centers for disease control and prevention at different levels( n =16), academic and research institutions( n =3). Their work experience in school health related fields ranged from 6 to 33 years, with an average of (16.70±8.25) years. The activeness of experts in both rounds of consultation was 100%, the mean expert authority coefficient was 0.90, and the mean feasibility evaluation was 0.75. Kendall s W test showed that the expert coordination coefficient for the first round was 0.26, and for the second round, it was 0.33 ( P <0.01). After two rounds of expert consultation, a set of quality control evaluation indicators for the surveillance of common diseases among students was ultimately constructed, including 6 first level indicators, 19 second level indicators, and 37 third level indicators.
Conclusion:The scientifically developed evaluation indicator system facilitates high quality implementation of student common disease surveillance programs.
