Analysis on current situation of position training of clinical pharmacists in medical institutions in China
- VernacularTitle:我国医疗机构临床药师岗位培训现状分析
- Author:
Dongni ZHENG
1
,
2
;
Ya CHEN
3
;
Mi GAN
4
;
Shunlong OU
3
;
Yongdong JIN
5
;
Zhiqiang HU
3
;
Xiaoyi CHEN
2
;
Jinqi LI
6
,
7
;
Qian JIANG
2
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，Chengdu Fifth People’s Hospital，Chengdu 611130，China
2. School of Medicine，University of Electronic Science and Technology of China/Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute，Chengdu 610054，China
3. Dept. of Pharmacy，Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute/Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Sichuan Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center/Affiliate Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China，Chengdu 610041，China
4. Dept. of Education，Affiliate Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China，Chengdu 610041，China
5. Dept. of Oncology，Affiliate Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China，Chengdu 610041，China
6. Dept. of Pharmacy，Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital，Chengdu 610072，China
7. School of Medicine，University of Electronic Science and Technology of China/Personalized Drug Therapy Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province，Chengdu 610072，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
clinical pharmacist;
position training;
clinical pharmacy talent;
systematic review
- From:
China Pharmacy
2025;36(12):1424-1429
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To summarize the current status of position training for clinical pharmacists in China and provide references for the continuous optimization of such training programs. METHODS SinoMed， CNKI，VIP and Wanfang Data were electronically searched to collect position training of clinical pharmacists studies from the inception until November 5th 2024. After data extraction and quality evaluation， descriptive analysis was performed on the results of the included studies. RESULTS & A total of 68 pieces of relevant literature were included in the study. Among them， 50 studies reported on training content， 49 involved the allocation of teaching resources in the bases， 48 addressed training methods， and 39 focused on training evaluation； only 2 studies mentioned faculty development. There were notable variations in the clinical pharmacist training programs across different bases， particularly in the allocation of teaching resources， such as the composition of the teaching team and the utilization of auxiliary teaching tools. Additionally， differences existed in training approaches， such as those employing a single method versus a blended approach. Conversely， the core training content of each base generally revolved around clinical pharmacy practice， demonstrating a degree of consistency. Moreover， the overall emphasis on teacher training and assessment tended to be obviously insufficient. Each base can focus on enhancing the competence of clinical pharmacists by allocating teaching resources， selecting training methods， improving training content， and using evaluation tools， to further enhance the quality of clinical pharmacist training.
