Construction of an evaluation index system for community visual health services in Shanghai
10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2025.24546
- VernacularTitle:上海市社区视觉健康服务评价指标体系的构建
- Author:
Chengyuan ZHANG
1
;
Yuting WU
2
;
Yajun PENG
3
;
Tao YU
3
;
Yi XU
3
;
Senlin LIN
3
;
Haidong ZOU
3
;
Lina LU
3
Author Information
1. Jinshanwei Community Health Service Center of Jinshan District, Shanghai 201512, China
2. School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
3. Shanghai Eye Diseases Prevention & Treatment Center/Shanghai Eye Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, National Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Eye Diseases, Shanghai 200336, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
community;
visual health;
Delphi method;
evaluation index system
- From:
Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine
2025;37(3):282-287
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo improve the quality and service performance of community visual health services in Shanghai, and to establish a set of reasonable and effective evaluation index system for community visual health services. MethodsCentered on the national and Shanghai-based visual health policies and based on the current status and development trends of community visual health service program in Shanghai, the candidate indicators were formed through literature review and expert interviews, firstly. The framework of an evaluation index system was formulated through qualitative research successively, which was further revised and perfected using the Delphi method. Coefficient weights were calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), culminating in the establishment of the community visual health evaluation index system, lastly. ResultsA total of 22 visual health experts from district-level center for disease control, hospital ophthalmology and leaders in charging of visual health service in community health centers participated in the Delphi questionnaire survey, with a questionnaire recovery rate of 100% and an expert authority coefficient of 0.86, indicating high credibility. After a round of correspondence to experts’ importance ratings and discussions, a comprehensive evaluation index system comprising 3 primary indicators, 12 secondary indicators, and 47 tertiary indicators, along with 5 additional indicators, was finalized. ConclusionAn index system tailored to effective evaluation for community visual health initiatives was drawn up in this study, which can promote the capacity building in community eye health services, facilitating the high-quality development of visual health courses, and enhancing residents’ eye health.
