Scabies is a highly contagious neglected tropical disease and a persistent challenge globally, particularly in regions like the Philippines, where it remains endemic. With conventional treatments facing limitations such as resistance and adverse effects, exploring the potential of traditional medicinal plants offers a promising avenue for novel therapeutics. However, evidence of their comparative efficacy and safety is still lacking.

To determine the efficacy and safety of Gliricidia sepium (kakawati), Senna alata (akapulko), and Tinospora rumphii (makabuhay) compared to topical scabicides or placebo in the treatment of Filipino patients with scabies using a systematic review. 

We searched the following databases from inception to March 2024: MEDLINE via PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, EBSCO, HERDIN, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO-ICRTP, and PHRR. We included all randomized controlled trials involving Filipino patients diagnosed with scabies where preparations containing one of three plants (G. sepium, S. alata, or T. rumphii) were compared with a topical scabicide or placebo for treatment. Two review authors independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed risk of bias (using Risk of Bias 2.0), and extracted data from the included studies. Primary outcomes were complete clearance of skin lesions, reduction of pruritus, and the presence of serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were recurrence, any adverse events, adverse events requiring withdrawal, and patientreported outcomes. We used RevMan 5.4 to pool dichotomous outcomes using risk ratios and continuous outcomes using mean difference and applied random-effects meta-analysis. We tested for statistical heterogeneity using both the Chi2 test and the I2 statistic. We presented the results using forest plots with 95% confidence intervals. We intended to conduct a funnel plot analysis to check for reporting bias but were unable to because of the limited number of studies. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach, and a Summary of Findings table was created using GRADEpro GDT for the primary outcomes.

We included nine RCTs (N=607 participants) that compared various dosage forms (ointments, lotions, poultice, soap, aqueous extract) containing one of the three plants (G. sepium, three studies; S. alata, two studies; T. rumphii, four studies) versus placebo or existing topical scabicides (permethrin, sulfur, crotamiton). Pooled analyses showed that there is probably no difference in complete clearance of lesions between G. sepium and 5% sulfur (RR 0.92 [0.79, 1.07], 2 RCTs, N=85, moderate certainty of evidence). We are uncertain about the difference in complete clearance of lesions between S. alata lotion and placebo (RR 4.94 [1.67, 14.62], 2 RCTs, N=157, very low certainty of evidence), T. rumphii and crotamiton (RR 1.02 [0.76, 1.37], 2 RCTs, N=131, very low certainty of evidence), and T. rumphii lotion and placebo (RR 5.28 [0.76, 36.43], 2 RCTs, N=71, very low certainty of evidence). Data could not be pooled for reduction in pruritus scores due to limited studies for each intervention. No serious adverse events were reported across all studies.

Gliricidia sepium (kakawati) is probably as effective and safe as 5% sulfur in the management of patients with scabies and may be a promising alternative herbal treatment. Future RCTs should compare it with scabicides recommended by the Philippine Department of Health and World Health Organization, such as permethrin, benzyl benzoate or oral ivermectin. T. rumphii and S. alata may also be investigated using RCTs that should be adequately powered and with good methodologic quality.