Tuberculosis (TB) remains to be prevalent in the Philippines and globally. Female genital tuberculosis has devastating and permanent consequences, hence, timely and adequate treatment is needed. Since more data regarding optimal duration of treatment of genital tuberculosis are needed, this study compares the treatment response at six months and after at least nine months of treatment, with the intention of determining the most practical management for genital tuberculosis.

A retrospective chart review was conducted for newly diagnosed cases of genital tuberculosis who met the inclusion criteria. Treatment response was categorized into clinical, microbiologic, histologic, radiologic, and sonographic responses. Responses to treatment were evaluated as either partial or complete at the 6th month and after at least 9 months of treatment, and the proportions were compared.

Out of 140 charts retrieved, only 43 were included. Statistically significant difference was found only in clinical response, primarily due to patients who did not achieve resumption of menstruation within the f irst six months of treatment. The rest of the treatment responses and adverse drug events are equally the same for both time periods.

Results of this study show that the proportion of patients with microbiologic, histologic, radiologic, and sonographic response to treatment at the 6th month did not significantly differ to the proportion of patients who responded at the 9th or 12th month of treatment. This leads to a conclusion that the 6-month treatment regimen will be more practical in treating genital tuberculosis, except in amenorrheic premenopausal women who may warrant extension of treatment. Further studies on post-treatment rates of relapse and sonographic resolution are needed.