Effects of dental implant surface treated with sandblasting large grit acid-etching and femtosecond laser on implant stability, marginal bone volume, and histological results in a rabbit model
10.4047/jap.2025.17.2.101
- Author:
Young-Tak SON
1
;
KeunBaDa SON
;
Hoseong CHO
;
Jae-Mok LEE
;
Sm Abu SALEAH
;
JunHo HWANG
;
JongHoon LEE
;
HyunDeok KIM
;
Myoung-Uk JIN
;
Jeehyun KIM
;
Mansik JEON
;
Kyu-Bok LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
2025;17(2):101-114
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to compare the surface characteristics and healing patterns after implantation of implants treated with SLA and those treated with both SLA and femtosecond laser.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 10 male New Zealand white rabbits were used to compare recovery levels between implants treated with SLA (SLA group) and those treated with both SLA and femtosecond laser (SF group). The implants’ surface characteristics were determined through topographic evaluation, element analysis, surface roughness, and wettability evaluation. In total, 4 implants were placed in each rabbit (2 in each tibia), with 20 implants per treatment group. Using the implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone volume, and histological analysis (bone-to-implant contact (BIC), bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV)), and post implantation outcomes were assessed. Outcome data were analyzed using independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05).
RESULTS:No significant differences were noted between SLA and SF groups in terms of ISQ, marginal bone volume, BIC, and BV/TV (P > .05). However, significant differences in ISQ were observed within each group over time (P < .05). Furthermore, significant differences were noted in the marginal bone volume of the SF group (P < .05) and the BV/TV of the SLA group between weeks 4 and 6 (P < .05).
CONCLUSION:Surface treatment via SLA and femtosecond laser is feasible compared with SLA treatment alone in terms of ISQ, marginal bone volume, BIC, and BV/TV. However, further clinical research is warranted.
