Faster Acquisition and Improved Image Quality of T2-Weighted Dixon Breast MRI at 3T Using Deep Learning:A Prospective Study
- Author:
Caroline WILPERT
1
;
Hannah SCHNEIDER
;
Alexander RAU
;
Maximilian Frederic RUSSE
;
Benedict OERTHER
;
Ralph STRECKER
;
Marcel Dominic NICKEL
;
Elisabeth WEILAND
;
Alexa HAEGER
;
Matthias BENNDORF
;
Thomas MAYRHOFER
;
Jakob WEISS
;
Fabian BAMBERG
;
Marisa WINDFUHR-BLUM
;
Jakob NEUBAUER
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology 2025;26(1):29-42
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objective:The aim of this study was to compare image quality features and lesion characteristics between a faster deep learning (DL) reconstructed T2-weighted (T2-w) fast spin-echo (FSE) Dixon sequence with super-resolution (T2DL) and a conventional T2-w FSE Dixon sequence (T2STD) for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Materials and Methods:This prospective study was conducted between November 2022 and April 2023 using a 3T scanner.Both T2DL and T2STD sequences were acquired for each patient. Quantitative analysis was based on region-of-interest (ROI) measurements of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative analysis was performed independently by two radiologists using Likert scales to evaluate various image quality features, morphology, and diagnostic confidence for cysts and breast cancers. Reader preference between T2DL and T2STD was assessed via side-by-side comparison, and inter-reader reliability was also analyzed.
Results:Total of 151 women were enrolled, with 140 women (mean age: 52 ± 14 years; 85 cysts and 31 breast cancers) included in the final analysis. The acquisition time was 110 s ± 0 for T2DL compared to 266 s ± 0 for T2STD. SNR and CNR were significantly higher in T2DL (P < 0.001). T2DL was associated with higher image quality scores, reduced noise, and fewer artifacts (P < 0.001). All evaluated anatomical regions (breast and axilla), breast implants, and bone margins were rated higher in T2DL (P ≤ 0.008), except for bone marrow, which scored higher in T2STD (P < 0.001). Scores for conspicuity, sharpness/ margins, and microstructure of cysts and breast cancers were higher in T2DL (P ≤ 0.002). Diagnostic confidence for cysts was improved with T2DL (P < 0.001). Readers significantly preferred T2DL over T2STD in side-by-side comparisons (P < 0.001).
Conclusion:T2DL effectively corrected for SNR loss caused by accelerated image acquisition and provided a 58% reduction in acquisition time compared to T2STD. This led to fewer artifacts and improved overall image quality. Thus, T2DL is feasible and has the potential to replace conventional T2-w sequences for breast MRI examinations.
