Comparison of objective radiograph quality between radiographs obtained with wall-mounted and handheld X-ray devices
- Author:
Débora Costa RUIZ
1
;
Rocharles Cavalcante FONTENELE
;
Amanda FARIAS-GOMES
;
Matheus L. OLIVEIRA
;
Deborah Queiroz FREITAS
;
Francisco HAITER-NETO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Imaging Science in Dentistry 2025;55(1):22-27
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:This study was conducted to compare the objective image quality of radiographs acquired with a handheld X-ray device to those obtained with a wall-mounted X-ray device.
Materials and Methods:Brightness, noise, uniformity, and contrast were evaluated. To assess the first 3 parameters,radiographs of an acrylic block were acquired with an unused photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plate from the VistaScan system (Mini Easy, Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany). Initially, 6 radiographs were taken with a Focus X-ray wall-mounted device (Instrumentarium, Tuusula, Finland) operating at 60 kVp, 7 mA, and 0.125 s.Another 6 radiographs were captured using an Eagle handheld X-ray device (Alliage, São Paulo, Brazil) at 60 kVp, 2.5 mA, and 0.35 s. The means and standard deviations of the gray values for all radiographs were calculated using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). For contrast assessment, radiographs of an aluminum step wedge were obtained using the same PSP plate, X-ray devices, and acquisition parameters. The percentage of contrast variation was determined. The impacts of the devices on image quality were compared using the Student t-test, with a significance level of 5% (P<0.05).
Results:Compared with the wall-mounted device, the handheld device produced radiographs with higher brightness and noise, as indicated by mean values of 6.57 (0.49) and 3.49 (0.02), respectively. Furthermore, it demonstrated lower uniformity and contrast, with respective means of 3.75 (0.02) and 35.48 (0.09) (P<0.05).
Conclusion:Radiographs obtained using a handheld X-ray device exhibit lower theoretical image quality than those acquired with a wall-mounted device.
