Cost-effectiveness and other considerations for different research techniques applied in ancient DNA analysis
- Author:
Jong Ha HONG
1
;
Hisashi FUJITA
;
Jaehyup KIM
;
Dong Hoon SHIN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review Article
- From:Anatomy & Cell Biology 2025;58(1):8-13
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis has developed rapidly since it first emerged in the 1980s, becoming an almost indispensable tool in anthropological and archaeological sciences. Earlier aDNA study was based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, with which, unfortunately, modern DNA contamination and other authenticity issues were often incurred. These technical hurdles were soon overcome by application of advancements in the forms of the next generation sequencing (NGS) technique and others. However, since NGS requires money, time, and, in the case of large projects, manpower as well, genetic analysis of some ancient samples considered to be insignificant is commonly delayed or, in the worst cases, neglected entirely. We acknowledge that as a diagnostic tool in aDNA analysis, PCR is less accurate than NGS and more easily affected by modern DNA contamination; but it also has advantages, such as simplicity, time-saving, and greater ease of interpretation, among others. The role of PCR in aDNA analysis, then, should be reconsidered.
