The Role of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Extraprostatic Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.
10.4111/kju.2010.51.5.308
- Author:
Seo Yong PARK
1
;
Jung Jun KIM
;
Tae Heon KIM
;
Soo Hyun LIM
;
Deok Hyun HAN
;
Byung Kwan PARK
;
Chan Kyo KIM
;
Ghee Young KWON
;
Han Yong CHOI
;
Hyun Moo LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. besthml@medimail.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Neoplasm staging;
Prostatic neoplasms
- MeSH:
Biopsy;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy;
Magnetics;
Magnets;
Neoplasm Grading;
Neoplasm Staging;
Prostate;
Prostatectomy;
Prostatic Neoplasms;
Retrospective Studies;
Seminal Vesicles;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
2010;51(5):308-312
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the clinical value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 54 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The findings of endorectal MRI, performed at least 3 weeks after biopsy, were compared with the pathological results of radical prostatectomy specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the detection of extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion were calculated. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the endorectal MRI findings were 50.0%, 82.6%, and 77.8% for the detection of extraprostatic extension, respectively, and 75.0%, 92.0%, and 90.7% for the detection of seminal vesicle invasion, respectively. The sensitivity of endorectal MRI in the detection of extraprostatic extension improved as the Gleason score increased. CONCLUSIONS: Endorectal MRI findings demonstrated modest sensitivity for predicting extraprostatic extension, whereas specificity was relatively high. In addition, endorectal MRI showed better sensitivity for detecting high-grade tumors.
