Gaps and Similarities in Research Use LOINC Codes Utilized in Korean University Hospitals: Towards Semantic Interoperability for Patient Care
- Author:
Kuenyoul PARK
1
;
Min-Sun KIM
;
YeJin OH
;
John Hoon RIM
;
Shinae YU
;
Hyejin RYU
;
Eun-Jung CHO
;
Kyunghoon LEE
;
Ha Nui KIM
;
Inha CHUN
;
AeKyung KWON
;
Sollip KIM
;
Jae-Woo CHUNG
;
Hyojin CHAE
;
Ji Seon OH
;
Hyung-Doo PARK
;
Mira KANG
;
Yeo-Min YUN
;
Jong-Baeck LIM
;
Young Kyung LEE
;
Sail CHUN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(1):e4-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The accuracy of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mappings is reportedly low, and the LOINC codes used for research purposes in Korea have not been validated for accuracy or usability. Our study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies and similarities in interoperability using existing LOINC mappings in actual patient care settings.
Methods:We collected data on local test codes and their corresponding LOINC mappings from seven university hospitals. Our analysis focused on laboratory tests that are frequently requested, excluding clinical microbiology and molecular tests. Codes from nationwide proficiency tests served as intermediary benchmarks for comparison. A research team, comprising clinical pathologists and terminology experts, utilized the LOINC manual to reach a consensus on determining the most suitable LOINC codes.
Results:A total of 235 LOINC codes were designated as optimal codes for 162 frequent tests.Among these, 51 test items, including 34 urine tests, required multiple optimal LOINC codes, primarily due to unnoted properties such as whether the test was quantitative or qualitative, or differences in measurement units. We analyzed 962 LOINC codes linked to 162 tests across seven institutions, discovering that 792 (82.3%) of these codes were consistent. Inconsistencies were most common in the analyte component (38 inconsistencies, 33.3%), followed by the method (33 inconsistencies, 28.9%), and properties (13 inconsistencies, 11.4%).
Conclusion:This study reveals a significant inconsistency rate of over 15% in LOINC mappings utilized for research purposes in university hospitals, underlining the necessity for expert verification to enhance interoperability in real patient care.
