Comprehensive Classification of Surgically Resected Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Updates From a Single-Institution Experience Based on the WHO 5th Edition
- Author:
Hyunhee KIM
1
;
Eric Eunshik KIM
;
Yong Hwy KIM
;
Jin Woo PARK
;
Kyeong Cheon JUNG
;
Haeryoung KIM
;
Jae Kyung WON
;
Sung-Hye PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(16):e56-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The 5th edition of WHO classification (WHO5) renamed pituitary adenoma as pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET), aligning with NET nomenclature from other sites.This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of surgically resected PitNET based on the WHO5 classification.
Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 210 cases of surgically resected and pathologically confirmed PitNET treated at Seoul National University Hospital from 2021 to 2023. The tumors were graded using the French five-tiered grading system proposed by Trouillas et al. Detailed information on grade 3 metastatic PitNET cases is provided.
Results:The cohort’s median age was 53 years (age range: 8–84 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1. Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (range: 0.1–6.5 cm). Macroadenomas predominated (91.9%), followed by microadenoma (6.7%), and giant tumors (1.4%), with 56.2% extending suprasellarly. SF1-lineage PitNET was most prevalent (49.5%), followed by PIT1-lineage (23.3%) and TPIT-lineage (17.1%). Null cell tumors (5.7%) and unclassified plurihormonal PitNET (4.3%) were rare. PIT1-lineage PitNET comprised somatotrophs (47.0%), mature plurihormonal PIT1 lineage tumors (18.4%), thyrotrophs (16.3%), immature PIT1-lineage tumors (16.3%), and acidophilic stem cell tumors (n=1), however, there was no lactotroph PitNET. Among SF1-lineage tumors, serologically non-functional tumors predominated (79%), while, immunohistochemically, 71.2% were gonadotrophin (FSH/LH)-positive.Tumor grades by the French five-tiered classification system were distributed as follows:grade 1a (58.1%), 1b (17.6%), 2a (16.2%), 2b (7.1%), and 3 (1.0%). Two cases of metastatic corticotroph PitNET were observed: The first case, a 50-year-old female had liver metastasis and experienced tumor recurrence 7 years after his initial diagnosis of PitNET, ultimately dying 9.5 years later. The primary tumor appeared bland, but the metastatic tumor exhibited a high mitotic rate and a Ki-67 index was 48%. The second case involved a 44-year-old man with metastases to the paranasal sinus, liver, and bone. Despite showing initial bland histopathology and a low proliferation index, this tumor displayed aggressive behavior.The patient had a recurrence 1.5 years after diagnosis, with additional metastases emerging 3 years later. He survived for 8.0 years and is currently disease-free following surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.
Conclusion:This comprehensive analysis of surgically resected PitNETs using the new WHO5 classification provides valuable insights into the distribution of the subtypes in the surgical cohort. Key findings were the predominant gonadotroph PitNET, the absence of lactotroph PitNET, and the rarity of null cell tumors in surgical cases. The lack of lactotrophs was mainly due to medical treatment. This study highlights the discrepancy between serological and immunohistochemical findings of SF1-lineage PitNETs. While metastatic PitNET cases showed poor prognosis, the predictive value of the French grading system for PitNET requires further validation through extended follow-up.
