A Comparison between Keratograph 5M® and IDRA® in Dry Eye Patients
10.3341/jkos.2025.66.4.175
- Author:
Seo Woo PARK
1
;
Ha-Rim SO
;
Ji Won BAEK
;
Ho Sik HWANG
;
Kyung-Sun NA
;
Ho RA
;
Nam Yeo KANG
;
Hyun Seung KIM
;
Eun Chul KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
2025;66(4):175-180
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Purpose:To evaluate the compatibility and usability of test results obtained from the IDRA and Keratograph 5M in clinical settings by comparing their performance in patients with dry eye disease.
Methods:From December 27 to 30, 2022, a study was conducted on 30 patients diagnosed with dry eye utilizing both the Keratograph 5M and IDRA devices. The parameters compared and analyzed included lipid layer thickness, tear meniscus height, tear film break-up time, and meibography. A paired t-test was used for statistical comparison. The lipid layer thickness in the Keratograph 5M was graded on a scale from 0 to 4 based on thickness.
Results:No significant differences were found between the two devices in tear film break-up time, tear meniscus height, and meibography (p = 0.148, 0.072, 0.124, respectively). However, the tear lipid layer thickness measured by IDRA showed a proportional relationship with the grade assigned by the Keratograph 5M (Kendall R = 0.217, p = 0.037; Spearman R = 0.260, p = 0.045).
Conclusions:The IDRA device offers the advantage of performing multiple dry eye tests; simultaneously, thereby saving time compared to the Keratograph 5M. Both devices can be used compatibly with IDRA particularly advantageous for providing a numerical value for tear lipid layer thickness which enhances the convenience of dry eye diagnosis and treatment.
