Washout-parametric imaging with Sonazoid for enhanced differentiation of focal liver lesions
- Author:
Tatsuya KAKEGAWA
1
;
Katsutoshi SUGIMOTO
;
Naohisa KAMIYAMA
;
Hiroshi HASHIMOTO
;
Hiroshi TAKAHASHI
;
Takuya WADA
;
Yu YOSHIMASU
;
Hirohito TAKEUCHI
;
Ryohei NAKAYAMA
;
Kentaro SAKAMAKI
;
Takao ITOI
Author Information
- Publication Type:1
- From: Ultrasonography 2024;43(6):457-468
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:The study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of washout-parametric imaging (WOPI) with that of conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (cCEUS) in differentiating focal liver lesions (FLLs).
Methods:A total of 181 FLLs were imaged with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using Sonazoid, and the recordings were captured for 10 minutes in a prospective setting. WOPI was constructed from three images, depicting the arterial phase (peak enhancement), the early portal venous phase (1-minute post-injection), and the vasculo-Kupffer phase (5 or 10 minutes post-injection). The intensity variations in these images were color-coded and superimposed to produce a single image representing the washout timing across the lesions. From the 181 FLLs, 30 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 30 non-HCC malignancies, and 30 benign lesions were randomly selected for an observer study. Both techniques (cCEUS and WOPI) were evaluated by four off-site readers. They classified each lesion as benign or malignant using a continuous rating scale, with the endpoints representing "definitely benign" and "definitely malignant." The diagnostic performance of cCEUS and WOPI was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the DeLong test. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results:The difference in average AUC values between WOPI and cCEUS was 0.0062 (95% confidence interval, -0.0161 to 0.0285), indicating no significant difference between techniques. The interobserver agreement was higher for WOPI (ICC, 0.77) than cCEUS (ICC, 0.67).
Conclusion:The diagnostic performance of WOPI is comparable to that of cCEUS in differentiating FLLs, with superior interobserver agreement.
