The Utility and Feasibility of Smart Glasses in Spine Surgery: Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion
- Author:
Yoshiaki HIRANAKA
1
;
Yoshiki TAKEOKA
;
Takashi YURUBE
;
Takeru TSUJIMOTO
;
Yutaro KANDA
;
Kunihiko MIYAZAKI
;
Hiroki OHNISHI
;
Tomoya MATSUO
;
Masao RYU
;
Naotoshi KUMAGAI
;
Kohei KUROSHIMA
;
Ryosuke KURODA
;
Kenichiro KAKUTANI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From: Neurospine 2024;21(2):432-439
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objective:Spine surgeons are often at risk of radiation exposure due to intraoperative fluoroscopy, leading to health concerns such as carcinogenesis. This is due to the increasing use of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) in spinal surgeries, resulting from the widespread adoption of minimally invasive spine stabilization. This study aimed to elucidate the effectiveness of smart glasses (SG) in PPS insertion under fluoroscopy.
Methods:SG were used as an alternative screen for fluoroscopic images. Operators A (2-year experience in spine surgery) and B (9-year experience) inserted the PPS into the bilateral L1–5 pedicles of the lumbar model bone under fluoroscopic guidance, repeating this procedure twice with and without SG (groups SG and N-SG, respectively). Each vertebral body’s insertion time, radiation dose, and radiation exposure time were measured, and the deviation in screw trajectories was evaluated.
Results:The groups SG and N-SG showed no significant difference in insertion time for the overall procedure and each operator. However, group SG had a significantly shorter radiation exposure time than group N-SG for the overall procedure (109.1 ± 43.5 seconds vs. 150.9 ± 38.7 seconds; p = 0.003) and operator A (100.0 ± 29.0 seconds vs. 157.9 ± 42.8 seconds; p = 0.003). The radiation dose was also significantly lower in group SG than in group N-SG for the overall procedure (1.3 ± 0.6 mGy vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 mGy; p = 0.023) and operator A (1.2 ± 0.4 mGy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 mGy; p = 0.013). The 2 groups showed no significant difference in screw deviation.
Conclusion:The application of SG in fluoroscopic imaging for PPS insertion holds potential as a useful method for reducing radiation exposure.
