Can left atrial diameter measured by computed tomography predict the presence and degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction?
- Author:
Gae An KIM
1
;
Ji Ung NA
;
Dong Hyuk SHIN
;
Jang Hee LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From: Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2024;11(4):358-364
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: This study was conducted to determine whether the presence and degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) can be predicted by the simple computed tomography -measured left atrial diameter (CTLAD). Methods Among adult patients who underwent both chest CT imaging and echocardiography in the emergency department from January 2020 to December 2021, a retrospective cross-sectional study enrolled patients in whom the time interval between the two tests was <24 hours. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic power of CTLAD for echocardiographic LVDD. Results In a study involving 373 patients, 192 (51.5%) had LVDD. Among them, 122 (63.5%) had grade 1, 61 (31.8%) had grade 2, and nine (4.7%) had ≥grade 3. Median CTLAD values were 4.1 cm for grade 1, 4.5 cm for grade 2, and 4.9 cm for ≥grade 3. The area under the ROC curve value of CTLAD in distinguishing ≥grade 1, ≥grade 2 (optimal cutoff ≥4.4 cm), and ≥grade 3 (optimal cutoff ≥4.5 cm) were 0.588, 0.657 (sensitivity, 61.4%; specificity, 66.0%, positive predictive value, 29.5%; negative predictive value, 88.1%; odds ratio, 3.1), and 0.834 (sensitivity, 88.9%; specificity, 70.1%; positive predictive value, 6.8%; negative predictive value, 99.6%, odds ratio, 18.7), respectively. Conclusion CTLAD ≥4.4 cm can be used as a rough reference value to distinguish LVDD of ≥grade 2, while CTLAD ≥4.5 cm can reliably distinguish LVDD of ≥grade 3. CTLAD might be a useful parameter for predicting LVDD in situations where echocardiography is not available.
